'We would like NeoLoad to be able to support more protocols. The general feedback on performance testing with Tricentis NeoLoad for all product lines within my company is good.' 'NeoLoad is actually really good, mainly because they have a world-class support service.' I also like that you can scale up Tricentis NeoLoad very quickly. The load generation agents getting placed on different geographies is a very good feature of the solution. It provides API support.' 'My company has a good experience with Tricentis NeoLoad, and what I like best about it is that it lets you generate loads from different geographies. NeoLoad Web and the API are also valuable. The straightforward implementation of Tricentis NeoLoad, including ease of use, is also valuable to my team.' 'There aren't other solutions as competitive as Tricentis NeoLoad when it comes to the performance side.' 'The most valuable feature is the ability to execute parallel requests, unlike JMeter and LoadRunner which can only be run sequentially.' 'The stability is okay.' 'I feel that the codeless part, the dynamic value capture part is quite easy in NeoLoad compared to other tools.' 'The Frameworks feature is valuable. I also found the Result Manager a fascinating part of Tricentis NeoLoad because of the way it collates results and presents reports. The tool has a better design, scenarios, and model, which I find helpful. 'What I found best in Tricentis NeoLoad is that it's better with scripting and load test execution in the load testing environment compared to its competitors.

Neoload vs jmeter